To let users find the good explanation about allocation and retention
policies from the docs easier.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
I mean the whole distro uses quite some C and the like as base, so
avoid being overly strict here.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
It does not help users if that is spelled out, and its not a common
use of GCM, and especially in the AES 256 context its clear what is
meant. The link to Wikipedia stays, so interested people can still
read up on it and others get a better overview due to the text being
more concise.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
The main feature list should provide a short overview of the, well,
main features. While enterprise support *is* a main and important
feature, it's not the place here to describe things like personal
volume/ngo/... offers and the like.
Move parts of it to getting help, which lacked mentioning the
enterprise support too and is a good place to describe the customer
portal.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Else one has quite a terrible UX when installing from 1.0 ISO and
then upgrading to latest release..
commit 0ec79339f7 for the fix and some other details
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
found and semi-manually replaced by using:
codespell -L mut -L crate -i 3 -w
Mostly in comments, but also email notification and two occurrences
of misspelled 'reserved' struct member, which where not used and
cargo build did not complain about the change, soo ...
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Less anti-aliasing to do, so it looks better when small.
Note, I use a mask as else we could not cut out something
transparent, but only over paint it filled with white, which is not
the same and not how font awesome does it.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
The old value just was way to heavy, and notes/warnings/...
admonitions did not stick out anymore.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
1. Use same height as width
2. drop the top/bottom "frame" lines
3. instead of two "bearings" side by side, like VHS or music-compact
tapes have, use a single bearing and an outer circle to denote the
magnetic tape edge
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
we test for the config key in the API so it makes sense to have as
test here too. Actually it would be better if we'd have a expect
Value defined here and enforce that it matches, but better than
nothing.
Fix the input for test 1, where tabs got replaced by spaces, as else
it fails
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Americans seem to sometimes use Avery 6577 which has 5/8" x 3"
labels, equaling 15.875 mm x 76.2 mm, so do not set the lower bound
to 17mm (which even breaks our used Avery 3240 sheets which have an
label height of 16.9 mm
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
marketing noted that it looked quite heavy weight, to the point where
it was hard to read to the full black squares, bold monospace text
and bottom borders with rather distinctive darkness.
Address those by:
* change color for list points from black to mid-dark grey
* use empty circles for second heading level
* ensure monospaced text has a normal font weight in the TOC headings
* some lighter color for the bottom border
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
As 20s is really not that high, especially for loaded setups one is
connected to through a spotty network (looking at you ÖBB railnet)
and gets latency spikes of 5 - 10s for some minutes at a time..
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Rund `codespell` tool, but it picked up not as much as I hoped.
Rest was found with vim + (hun)spell
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
and fix some issues from referenced named the same as their heading
they anchor too.
This should be fixed for real in our python plugin to scan for such
references, its probably a bug there, but as most of the problematic
ones where wrong (missing chapter prefix) anyway changing them is OK
too.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
"we" should be avoided, it's never quite clear who is "we" in the
context here and it leads to some technical wrong meanings, e.g., we
(here assumed to be "we developers") do not read any backup data, the
Proxmox Backup client does.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Fix two things:
* do not reject the login promise when we get the abort DOMException
error
* safely save the original challenge string as we work on a reference
here and avoid to convert to a UInt8 array twice to avoid an
exception.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
simple heuristic for those people who always prefer a specific TFA
method and have the others only as backup.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Improve UX by avoiding the need to click some buttons twice, or
calling TOTP and Recovery codes both "OTP" codes and showing multiple
buttons, with all having the same goal "submit a TFA token" at the
same time.
Instead use a tab panel with a single submit button.
WebAuthn can and should be still improved, but that can be OK as
followup.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
This is wrong most of the time, when not loading the web interface
with valid credentials, and thus some checks or defaults did not
evaluated correctly when the underlying value was only set later.
Needs to be set on component creation only, this can be done through
initComponent, even listeners, view controllers or cbind closures.
Use the latter, as all affected components already use cbind.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
present all relevant information about the TFA token to be removed,
so that a user can make a better decision.
Rework layout to match our commonly used style.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Clarify that the password of the user one wants to add TFA too is
required, which is not necessarily the one of the current logged in
user. Use an empty text for that.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
this is a HACK!
It seems that due to lots of binaries getting compiled from a single
crate the compiler is confused when linking in dependencies to each
binaries ELF.
It picks up the combined set (union) of all dependencies and sets
those to every ELF. This results in the client, for example, linking
to libapt-pkg or libsystemd even if none of that symbols are used..
This could be possibly fixed by restructuring the source tree into
sub crates/workspaces or what not, not really tested and *lots* of
work.
So as stop gap measure use `ldd -u` to find out unused linkage and
remove them using `patchelf`.
While this works well, and seems to not interfere with any debug
symbol usage or other usage in general it still is a hack and should
be dropped once the restructuring of the source tree has shown to
bring similar effects.
This allows for much easier re-use of the generated client .deb
package on other Debian derivaties (e.g., Ubuntu) which got blocked
until now due to wrong libt-apt verison or the like.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Thomas Lamprecht