Go to file
Thomas Lamprecht b84e8aaee9 server: rest: switch from fastest to default deflate compression level
I made some comparision with bombardier[0], the one listed here are
30s looped requests with two concurrent clients:

[ static download of ext-all.js ]:
  lvl                              avg /   stdev  / max
 none        1.98 MiB  100 %    5.17ms /  1.30ms / 32.38ms
 fastest   813.14 KiB   42 %   20.53ms /  2.85ms / 58.71ms
 default   626.35 KiB   30 %   39.70ms /  3.98ms / 85.47ms

[ deterministic (pre-defined data), but real API call ]:
  lvl                              avg /   stdev  / max
 none      129.09 KiB  100 %    2.70ms / 471.58us / 26.93ms
 fastest    42.12 KiB   33 %    3.47ms / 606.46us / 32.42ms
 default    34.82 KiB   27 %    4.28ms / 737.99us / 33.75ms

The reduction is quite better with default, but it's also slower, but
only when testing over unconstrained network. For real world
scenarios where compression actually matters, e.g., when using a
spotty train connection, we will be faster again with better
compression.

A GPRS limited connection (Firefox developer console) requires the
following load (until the DOMContentLoaded event triggered) times:
  lvl        t      x faster
 none      9m 18.6s   x 1.0
 fastest   3m 20.0s   x 2.8
 default   2m 30.0s   x 3.7

So for worst case using sligthly more CPU time on the server has a
tremendous effect on the client load time.

Using a more realistical example and limiting for "Good 2G" gives:

 none      1m  1.8s   x 1.0
 fastest      22.6s   x 2.7
 default      16.6s   x 3.7

16s is somewhat OK, >1m just isn't...

So, use default level to ensure we get bearable load times on
clients, and if we want to improve transmission size AND speed then
we could always use a in-memory cache, only a few MiB would be
required for the compressable static files we server.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
2021-04-07 17:57:42 +02:00
.cargo cargo: switch to use packaged crates by default 2020-01-03 09:40:33 +01:00
debian bump version to 1.0.13-1 2021-04-02 15:32:27 +02:00
docs docs: fix MathJax inclusion in build 2021-04-05 11:59:45 +02:00
etc docs: update package repositories 2020-11-10 13:14:04 +01:00
examples derive/impl and use Default for some structs 2021-01-26 09:54:45 +01:00
src server: rest: switch from fastest to default deflate compression level 2021-04-07 17:57:42 +02:00
tests verify-api: support nested AllOf schemas 2021-02-25 13:44:17 +01:00
www ui: verification job: fix subject of edit window 2021-03-28 16:57:00 +02:00
zsh-completions add proxmox-tape zsh-completions 2021-03-03 16:09:39 +01:00
.gitignore .gitignore: do not ingnor .html files - we have some of them in the repository 2021-02-21 10:04:52 +01:00
Cargo.toml tools/compression: add DeflateEncoder and helpers 2021-04-07 12:34:31 +02:00
defines.mk docs: add datastore.cfg.5 man page 2021-02-10 11:05:02 +01:00
Makefile install proxmox-tape binary 2021-03-03 09:02:02 +01:00
README.rst docs: add more thoughts about chunk size 2020-12-01 10:28:06 +01:00
rustfmt.toml import rustfmt.toml 2019-08-22 13:44:57 +02:00
TODO.rst tape: add/use rust scsi changer implementation using libsgutil2 2021-01-25 13:14:07 +01:00

``rustup`` Toolchain
====================

We normally want to build with the ``rustc`` Debian package. To do that
you can set the following ``rustup`` configuration:

    # rustup toolchain link system /usr
    # rustup default system


Versioning of proxmox helper crates
===================================

To use current git master code of the proxmox* helper crates, add::

   git = "git://git.proxmox.com/git/proxmox"

or::

   path = "../proxmox/proxmox"

to the proxmox dependency, and update the version to reflect the current,
pre-release version number (e.g., "0.1.1-dev.1" instead of "0.1.0").


Local cargo config
==================

This repository ships with a ``.cargo/config`` that replaces the crates.io
registry with packaged crates located in ``/usr/share/cargo/registry``.

A similar config is also applied building with dh_cargo. Cargo.lock needs to be
deleted when switching between packaged crates and crates.io, since the
checksums are not compatible.

To reference new dependencies (or updated versions) that are not yet packaged,
the dependency needs to point directly to a path or git source (e.g., see
example for proxmox crate above).


Build
=====
on Debian Buster

Setup:
  1. # echo 'deb http://download.proxmox.com/debian/devel/ buster main' >> /etc/apt/sources.list.d/proxmox-devel.list
  2. # sudo wget http://download.proxmox.com/debian/proxmox-ve-release-6.x.gpg -O /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/proxmox-ve-release-6.x.gpg
  3. # sudo apt update
  4. # sudo apt install devscripts debcargo clang
  5. # git clone git://git.proxmox.com/git/proxmox-backup.git
  6. # sudo mk-build-deps -ir

Note: 2. may be skipped if you already added the PVE or PBS package repository

You are now able to build using the Makefile or cargo itself.


Design Notes
============

Here are some random thought about the software design (unless I find a better place).


Large chunk sizes
-----------------

It is important to notice that large chunk sizes are crucial for
performance. We have a multi-user system, where different people can do
different operations on a datastore at the same time, and most operation
involves reading a series of chunks.

So what is the maximal theoretical speed we can get when reading a
series of chunks? Reading a chunk sequence need the following steps:

- seek to the first chunk start location
- read the chunk data
- seek to the first chunk start location
- read the chunk data
- ...

Lets use the following disk performance metrics:

:AST: Average Seek Time (second)
:MRS: Maximum sequential Read Speed (bytes/second)
:ACS: Average Chunk Size (bytes)

The maximum performance you can get is::

  MAX(ACS) = ACS /(AST + ACS/MRS)

Please note that chunk data is likely to be sequential arranged on disk, but
this it is sort of a best case assumption.

For a typical rotational disk, we assume the following values::

  AST: 10ms
  MRS: 170MB/s

  MAX(4MB)  = 115.37 MB/s
  MAX(1MB)  =  61.85 MB/s;
  MAX(64KB) =   6.02 MB/s;
  MAX(4KB)  =   0.39 MB/s;
  MAX(1KB)  =   0.10 MB/s;

Modern SSD are much faster, lets assume the following::

  max IOPS: 20000 => AST = 0.00005
  MRS: 500Mb/s

  MAX(4MB)  = 474 MB/s
  MAX(1MB)  = 465 MB/s;
  MAX(64KB) = 354 MB/s;
  MAX(4KB)  =  67 MB/s;
  MAX(1KB)  =  18 MB/s;


Also, the average chunk directly relates to the number of chunks produced by
a backup::

  CHUNK_COUNT = BACKUP_SIZE / ACS

Here are some staticics from my developer worstation::

  Disk Usage:       65 GB
  Directories:   58971
  Files:        726314
  Files < 64KB: 617541

As you see, there are really many small files. If we would do file
level deduplication, i.e. generate one chunk per file, we end up with
more than 700000 chunks.

Instead, our current algorithm only produce large chunks with an
average chunks size of 4MB. With above data, this produce about 15000
chunks (factor 50 less chunks).