Go to file
Thomas Lamprecht 930a71460f human byte: add proper unit type and support base-10
The new SizeUnit type takes over the auto scaling logic and could be
used on its own too.

Switch the internal type of HumanByte from u64 to f64, this results
in a slight reduce of usable sizes we can represent (there's no
unsigned float type after all) but we support pebibyte now with quite
the precision and ebibytes should be also work out ok, and that
really should us have covered for a while..

Partially adapted by Dietmar's version, but split up and change so:
* there's no None type, for a SizeUnit that does not makes much sense
* print the unit for byte too, better consistency and one can still
  use as_u64() or as_f64() if they do not want/need the unit rendered
* left the "From usize/u64" impls intact, just convenient to have and
  avoids all over the tree changes to adapt to loosing that
* move auto-scaling into SizeUnit, good fit there and I could see
  some re-use potential for non-human-byte users in the future
* impl Display for SizeUnit instead of the separate unit_str method,
  better usability as it can be used directly in format (with zero
  alloc/copy) and saw no real reason of not having that this way
* switch the place where we auto-scale in HumanByte's to the new_X
  helpers which allows for slightly reduced code usage and simplify
  implementation where possible
* use rounding for the precision limit algorithm. This is a stupid
  problem as in practices there are cases for requiring every variant:
  - flooring would be good for limits, better less than to much
  - ceiling would be good for file sizes, to less can mean ENOSPACE
    and user getting angry if their working value is messed with
  - rounding can be good for rendering benchmark, closer to reality
    and no real impact
  So going always for rounding is really not the best solution..

Some of those changes where naturally opinionated, if there's a good
practical reason we can switch back (or to something completely
different).

The single thing I kept and am not _that_ happy with is being able to
have fractional bytes (1.1 B or even 0.01 B), which just does not
makes much sense as most of those values cannot exist at all in
reality - I say most as multiple of 1/8 Byte can exists, those are
bits.o

Note, the precission also changed from fixed 2 to max 3 (trailing
zeros stripped), while that can be nice we should see if we get
a better precision limiting algorithm, e.g., directly in the printer.
Rust sadly does not supports "limit to precision of 3 but avoid
trailing zeros" so we'd need to adapt their Grisu based algorithm our
own - way to much complexity for this though..

Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
2021-11-20 19:35:24 +01:00
.cargo cargo: switch to use packaged crates by default 2020-01-03 09:40:33 +01:00
debian depend on proxmox-async 0.2 2021-11-20 17:14:02 +01:00
docs docs: remote sync: adapt to changed filter param and add some examples 2021-11-18 10:40:19 +01:00
etc update enterprise repository to bullseye 2021-06-28 19:57:50 +02:00
examples use new proxmox-async crate 2021-11-19 18:03:22 +01:00
pbs-api-types human byte: add proper unit type and support base-10 2021-11-20 19:35:24 +01:00
pbs-buildcfg bump version to 2.0.14-1 2021-11-12 08:12:18 +01:00
pbs-client move HumanByte to pbs-abi-types crate 2021-11-20 19:35:24 +01:00
pbs-config use new proxmox-sys crate 2021-11-19 11:06:35 +01:00
pbs-datastore move HumanByte to pbs-abi-types crate 2021-11-20 19:35:24 +01:00
pbs-fuse-loop update to first proxmox crate split 2021-10-11 11:58:49 +02:00
pbs-tape use proxmox::tools::fd::fd_change_cloexec from proxmox 0.15.3 2021-11-18 13:43:41 +01:00
pbs-tools move HumanByte to pbs-abi-types crate 2021-11-20 19:35:24 +01:00
proxmox-backup-banner issue banner: avoid depending on proxmox crate for hostname 2021-07-19 16:32:50 +02:00
proxmox-backup-client depend on proxmox-async 0.2 2021-11-20 17:14:02 +01:00
proxmox-file-restore depend on proxmox-async 0.2 2021-11-20 17:14:02 +01:00
proxmox-rest-server depend on proxmox-async 0.2 2021-11-20 17:14:02 +01:00
proxmox-restore-daemon depend on proxmox-async 0.2 2021-11-20 17:14:02 +01:00
proxmox-rrd use proxmox::tools::fd::fd_change_cloexec from proxmox 0.15.3 2021-11-18 13:43:41 +01:00
pxar-bin depend on proxmox-async 0.2 2021-11-20 17:14:02 +01:00
src move HumanByte to pbs-abi-types crate 2021-11-20 19:35:24 +01:00
tests use new proxmox-sys crate 2021-11-19 11:06:35 +01:00
www ui: tape: show configred group filters 2021-11-18 10:36:57 +01:00
zsh-completions zsh: fix completions 2021-09-03 10:29:48 +02:00
.gitignore .gitignore: do not ingnor .html files - we have some of them in the repository 2021-02-21 10:04:52 +01:00
Cargo.toml depend on proxmox-async 0.2 2021-11-20 17:14:02 +01:00
defines.mk docs: add datastore.cfg.5 man page 2021-02-10 11:05:02 +01:00
Makefile use new proxmox-async crate 2021-11-19 18:03:22 +01:00
README.rst docs: add more thoughts about chunk size 2020-12-01 10:28:06 +01:00
rustfmt.toml import rustfmt.toml 2019-08-22 13:44:57 +02:00
TODO.rst tape: add/use rust scsi changer implementation using libsgutil2 2021-01-25 13:14:07 +01:00

``rustup`` Toolchain
====================

We normally want to build with the ``rustc`` Debian package. To do that
you can set the following ``rustup`` configuration:

    # rustup toolchain link system /usr
    # rustup default system


Versioning of proxmox helper crates
===================================

To use current git master code of the proxmox* helper crates, add::

   git = "git://git.proxmox.com/git/proxmox"

or::

   path = "../proxmox/proxmox"

to the proxmox dependency, and update the version to reflect the current,
pre-release version number (e.g., "0.1.1-dev.1" instead of "0.1.0").


Local cargo config
==================

This repository ships with a ``.cargo/config`` that replaces the crates.io
registry with packaged crates located in ``/usr/share/cargo/registry``.

A similar config is also applied building with dh_cargo. Cargo.lock needs to be
deleted when switching between packaged crates and crates.io, since the
checksums are not compatible.

To reference new dependencies (or updated versions) that are not yet packaged,
the dependency needs to point directly to a path or git source (e.g., see
example for proxmox crate above).


Build
=====
on Debian Buster

Setup:
  1. # echo 'deb http://download.proxmox.com/debian/devel/ buster main' >> /etc/apt/sources.list.d/proxmox-devel.list
  2. # sudo wget http://download.proxmox.com/debian/proxmox-ve-release-6.x.gpg -O /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/proxmox-ve-release-6.x.gpg
  3. # sudo apt update
  4. # sudo apt install devscripts debcargo clang
  5. # git clone git://git.proxmox.com/git/proxmox-backup.git
  6. # sudo mk-build-deps -ir

Note: 2. may be skipped if you already added the PVE or PBS package repository

You are now able to build using the Makefile or cargo itself.


Design Notes
============

Here are some random thought about the software design (unless I find a better place).


Large chunk sizes
-----------------

It is important to notice that large chunk sizes are crucial for
performance. We have a multi-user system, where different people can do
different operations on a datastore at the same time, and most operation
involves reading a series of chunks.

So what is the maximal theoretical speed we can get when reading a
series of chunks? Reading a chunk sequence need the following steps:

- seek to the first chunk start location
- read the chunk data
- seek to the first chunk start location
- read the chunk data
- ...

Lets use the following disk performance metrics:

:AST: Average Seek Time (second)
:MRS: Maximum sequential Read Speed (bytes/second)
:ACS: Average Chunk Size (bytes)

The maximum performance you can get is::

  MAX(ACS) = ACS /(AST + ACS/MRS)

Please note that chunk data is likely to be sequential arranged on disk, but
this it is sort of a best case assumption.

For a typical rotational disk, we assume the following values::

  AST: 10ms
  MRS: 170MB/s

  MAX(4MB)  = 115.37 MB/s
  MAX(1MB)  =  61.85 MB/s;
  MAX(64KB) =   6.02 MB/s;
  MAX(4KB)  =   0.39 MB/s;
  MAX(1KB)  =   0.10 MB/s;

Modern SSD are much faster, lets assume the following::

  max IOPS: 20000 => AST = 0.00005
  MRS: 500Mb/s

  MAX(4MB)  = 474 MB/s
  MAX(1MB)  = 465 MB/s;
  MAX(64KB) = 354 MB/s;
  MAX(4KB)  =  67 MB/s;
  MAX(1KB)  =  18 MB/s;


Also, the average chunk directly relates to the number of chunks produced by
a backup::

  CHUNK_COUNT = BACKUP_SIZE / ACS

Here are some staticics from my developer worstation::

  Disk Usage:       65 GB
  Directories:   58971
  Files:        726314
  Files < 64KB: 617541

As you see, there are really many small files. If we would do file
level deduplication, i.e. generate one chunk per file, we end up with
more than 700000 chunks.

Instead, our current algorithm only produce large chunks with an
average chunks size of 4MB. With above data, this produce about 15000
chunks (factor 50 less chunks).