name sections according to the title or content and add
the respective onlineHelp to the following panels:
- datastore
- user management
- ACL
- backup remote
Signed-off-by: Oguz Bektas <o.bektas@proxmox.com>
Reviewed-By: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Tested-By: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
like the sync jobs, so that if an admin configures a schedule it
really starts the next time that time is reached not immediately
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
- Mention config files for: datastores, users, acl,
remotes, syncjobs
- Expand a little bit on SMART and smartmontools package
- Explain acl config
- Include line in network stating why a bond would be set up
- Note the use of ifupdown2 for network config, and the potential
need to install it on other systems
- Add note to PVE integration, specifying where to refer to for VM and
CT backups
Signed-off-by: Dylan Whyte <d.whyte@proxmox.com>
listing, updating or deleting a user is now possible for the user
itself, in addition to higher-privileged users that have appropriate
privileges on '/access/users'.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
filtered by those they are privileged enough to read individually. this
allows such users to configure prune/GC schedules via the GUI (the API
already allowed it previously).
permission-wise, a user with this privilege can already:
- list all stores they have access to (returns just name/comment)
- read the config of each store they have access to individually
(returns full config of that datastore + digest of whole config)
but combines them to
- read configs of all datastores they have access to (returns full
config of those datastores + digest of whole config)
user that have AUDIT on just /datastore without propagate can now no
longer read all configurations (but this could be added it back, it just
seems to make little sense to me).
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
by packing the auth into a RwLock and starting a background
future that renews the ticket every 15 minutes
we still use the BroadcastFuture for the first ticket and only
if that is finished we start the scheduled future
we have to store an abort handle for the renewal future and abort it when
the http client is dropped, so we do not request new tickets forever
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
like we do for PVE. this is visible on the dashboard, and caused 403 on
each update which bothers me when looking at the dev console.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
restructured text comment syntax, i.e., everything it cannot parse is
a comment, is a real PITA!
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
A client can omit uploading chunks in the "known_chunks" list, those
then also won't be written on the server side. Check all those chunks
mentioned in the index but not uploaded for existance and report an
error if they don't exist instead of marking a potentially broken backup
as "successful".
This is only important if the base snapshot references corrupted chunks,
but has not been negatively verified. Also, it is important to only
verify this at the end, *after* all index writers are closed, since only
then can it be guaranteed that no GC will sweep referenced chunks away.
If a chunk is found missing, also mark the previous backup with a
verification failure, since we know the missing chunk has to referenced
in it (only way it could have been inserted to known_chunks with
checked=false). This has the benefit of automatically doing a
full-upload backup if the user attempts to retry after seeing the new
error, instead of requiring a manual verify or forget.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
Do not allow clients to reuse chunks from the previous backup if it has
a failed validation result. This would result in a new "successful"
backup that potentially references broken chunks.
If the previous backup has not been verified, assume it is fine and
continue on.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
