when the user start an action where we know that it locks the drive,
reload the tape store, so that the state is refreshed
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
to make the following cryptic error:
proxmox-file-restore failed: Error: Invalid byte 46, offset 5.
more understandable:
proxmox-file-restore failed: Error: Failed base64-decoding path '/root.pxar.didx' - Invalid byte 46, offset 5.
when a user passes in a non-base64 path but sets `--base64`.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
basically the same as commit eeff085d9d
Will be required once we get to use a newer rustc, at least the
client build for archlinux was broken due to this.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
same functionality as crypto_parameters, except it keeps the file
descriptor passed as "keyfd" open (and seeks to the beginning after
reading), if one is given.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
For the actual partitions and blockdevices in a backup, which the
user sees like folders in the file-restore ui
Encoded as "None", to avoid cluttering DirEntryAttribute, where it
wouldn't make any sense to have.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
These can't be entered or restored anyway, and cause issues with catalog
files for example.
Also a clippy fix.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
in some configurations, samba stores NTFS-ACLs in this xattr[0], so
we should backup (if we can)
altough the 'security' namespace is special (e.g. in use by
selinux, etc.) this value is normally only used by samba and we
should be able to back it up.
to restore it, the user needs at least 'CAP_SYS_ADMIN' rights, otherwise
it cannot be set
0: https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/vfs_acl_xattr.8.html
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Some changer seem to append more data than we expect, but correctly
annotates that size in the subheader.
For each descriptor entry, read as much as the size given in the
subheader (or until the end of the reader), else our position in
the reader is wrong for the next entry, and we will parse
incorrect data.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
only check every 1024'th, which is cheaper to do than a modulo, as we
can just mask the 10 least-significant-bits and check if the result
is zero.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Fixes a non-negligible performance regression from commit
7f394c807b
While we skip known-verified chunks in the stat-and-inode-sort loop,
those are only the ones from previous indexes. If there's a repeated
chunk in one index they would get re-verified more often as required.
So, add the check again explicitly to the read+verify loop.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
before reading the chunks from disk in the order of the index file,
stat them first and sort them by inode number.
this can have a very positive impact on read speed on spinning disks,
even with the additional stat'ing of the chunks.
memory footprint should be tolerable, for 1_000_000 chunks
we need about ~16MiB of memory (Vec of 64bit position + 64bit inode)
(assuming 4MiB Chunks, such an index would reference 4TiB of data)
two small benchmarks (single spinner, ext4) here showed an improvement from
~430 seconds to ~330 seconds for a 32GiB fixed index
and from
~160 seconds to ~120 seconds for a 10GiB dynamic index
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
