this will be used for letting the user select multiple, individual
snapshots on restore (instead of having a single or the whole media-set)
if a 'prefilter' object is given, we filter the grid by those
values using the gridfilter plugins (like in pve's bulk action windows)
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
instead of having them in the toolbar. This makes the UI more consistent
with the datastore content view.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
when changin the remote, there is a high chance that there are different
datastores, and if a user does not pay attention, now the first store
of the new remote is selected, instead of the one with the same name
disable autoSelect and let the user manually select a remote datastore
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
we have 2 modi in that window:
* backup has multiple datastores
* backup has single datastore
In the first case we show a 'mapping' grid so that
the user can only restore a part. Here a user sees all source
Datastores and can select a target for each one.
In the second case we only have a single 'Datastore' selector, but
we do not show the source. Because of this, the naming is slightly ambiguous
(is it the 'Source' or the 'Target' ?), so rename it to 'Target Datastore'.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
by checking for definedness of the label (tapes without barcode
have the empty string as label-text) and falling back to the
source slot for the load action
Note: Changed the load-slot API from PUT to POST
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>
when the user start an action where we know that it locks the drive,
reload the tape store, so that the state is refreshed
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
if a user has not configured a drive for a specified driveslot of the
changer, simply hide that slot
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
datastore and tape entries are very similar but differ in some points
in such a way that a nice unification is not really that helpful, but
making similar key parts the same is still nice when reading the code
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
by using format_boolean for compression/write protect,
combining file/block posiition into one (saves a line)
and adding the missing alert-flags
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
it is rather pointless to let the user select something were there
is no choice. We have to keep the window though, since the user may
want to choose a pool
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
if a changer only has a single drive, there is no point in showing
a window with a DriveSelector, just do want the user wanted.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
to make it more like a 'dangerous' remove window
also works in the singleDrive logic to hide/show the driveselector
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
for some storages, it is valuable information, e.g. if one has datastores
on separate datasets of the same zpool
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
To let users find the good explanation about allocation and retention
policies from the docs easier.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
