Less anti-aliasing to do, so it looks better when small.
Note, I use a mask as else we could not cut out something
transparent, but only over paint it filled with white, which is not
the same and not how font awesome does it.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
The old value just was way to heavy, and notes/warnings/...
admonitions did not stick out anymore.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
1. Use same height as width
2. drop the top/bottom "frame" lines
3. instead of two "bearings" side by side, like VHS or music-compact
tapes have, use a single bearing and an outer circle to denote the
magnetic tape edge
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Simplifies the introduction a bit and makes it more readable.
Also some other minor language fixes throughout the section.
Signed-off-by: Dylan Whyte <d.whyte@proxmox.com>
Try once first to load the correct tape before sending an email to
insert the correct one. This way, the admin does not get a mail
if the correct tape is already inserted.
Also include the error we got that prompted the email to insert the
tape. This means that if the admin gets prompted to insert e.g.
"FOO" but inserts "BAR", he'll get an email that the wrong
tape is inserted.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
instead of silently discarding the error, else the user might be
confused because nothing happened
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
by adding the existing credential id to the 'excludeCredentials' list
this prevents the browser from registering a token twice, which
lets authentication fail on some browser/token combinations
(e.g. onlykey/solokey+chromium)
while is seems this is currently a bug in chromium, in a future spec
update the underlying behaviour should be better defined, making this
an authenticator bug
also explicitly catch registering errors and show appropriate error messages
0: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1087642
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
even if the options *could* be set in the frontend, the backend
actually has to do validation of those settings, thus we should not
make that a browser setting
additionally, having the value 'preferred' does not actually make sense,
since it does not add any security (the backend skips the
userverification check then)
This reverts commit aca4c2b5a9.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
the current default is 'Preferred', which is not really useful, as the
(web) client can simply change this to discouraged, since the
webauthn_rs crate does not verify the 'user_verified' bit of the
response in that case
setting this to 'Required' is not really useful either at the moment,
since a user can have a mix of different authenticators that may or
may not support user verification
there is ongoing discussion in the crate how to handle that[0]
we could probably expose this setting(discouraged/required) to the user/admin
and save it to the credential and allow only registering credentials
of the same type or filter them out on login (i.e. if there is an
authenticator that can handle userVerification, require it)
in any case, the current default is not helpful for security, but
makes loggin in harder, since the key will by default want to verify
the user
0: https://github.com/kanidm/webauthn-rs/pull/49
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Thomas Lamprecht
Dominik Csapak
Dietmar Maurer
Dylan Whyte