d5cf8f606c
if we give multiple options/ranges for a value, e.g. 2,4,8 we always choose the biggest, instead of the smallest that is next this happens because in DateTimeValue::find_next(value) 'next' can be set multiple times and we set it when the new value was *bigger* than the last found 'next' value, when in reality we have to choose the *smallest* next we can find reverse the comparison operator to fix this Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
disks | ||
systemd | ||
acl.rs | ||
async_io.rs | ||
borrow.rs | ||
broadcast_future.rs | ||
cert.rs | ||
daemon.rs | ||
disks.rs | ||
file_logger.rs | ||
format.rs | ||
fs.rs | ||
lru_cache.rs | ||
nom.rs | ||
process_locker.rs | ||
runtime.rs | ||
statistics.rs | ||
std_channel_writer.rs | ||
systemd.rs | ||
ticket.rs | ||
wrapped_reader_stream.rs | ||
xattr.rs |