the part number cannot go above 255 at the moment, but if it ever gets
bumped to a bigger integer type this boundary wouldn't cause a
compile-error. explicitly checking for overflowing u8 makes this a bit
more future-proof, and shuts up clippy as well ;)
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
some operations (e.g. garbage collection/restore/etc.) are very read
intensive on the chunks, and having atime=on and relatime=off (zfs default)
makes those write intensive operations too. Additionally, 'ext4' defaults to
relatime, so also change the default for api-created zpools.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
It is not necessary, so avoid it. The client can now be used
with multiple threads (without using a Mutex).
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>
the 'utc' flag is now contained in the event itself and not given
as a flag to 'compute_next_event' anymore
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>
- imported pbs-api-types/src/common_regex.rs from old proxmox crate
- use hex crate to generate/parse hex digest
- remove all reference to proxmox crate (use proxmox-sys and
proxmox-serde instead)
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>
commit c42a54795d introcuded a bug by
using fp.to_string(). Replace this with fp.signature() which correctly
returns the full fingerprint instead of the short version.
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>
by returning default data, in case the challenge data is not parseable.
this allows a new challenge to be started for the userid in question
without manual cleanup.
currently this can be triggered if an ongoing challenge created with
webauthn-rs 0.2.5 is stored in /run and attempted to be read
post-upgrade.
Reported-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
with current proxmox-tfa this became a hard error, since origin and rp
are not both Strings anymore..
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
we even use that for basically all the related schema names, "groups"
allone is just rather not so telling, i.e., "groups" what?
While due to the additive nature of `group-filter` is not the best
possible name for passing multiple arguments on the CLI (the web-ui
can present this more UX-friendly anyway) due to possible confusion
about if the filter act like AND vs OR it can be documented and even
if a user is confused they still are safe on more being synced than
less. Also, the original param name wasn't really _that_ better in
that regards
Dietmar also suggested to use singular for the CLI option, while
there can be more they're passed over repeating the option, each with
a single filter.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
and add a completion handler to complete the backup groups
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
this fixes bug #3533, since now a user can backup a single datastore
on multiple tape media pools in parallel, e.g. vms on one pool, ct on
another.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
