otherwise a user might get a task log like this:
-----
...
found 7 groups
TASK OK
-----
which could confuse the users as why there were no snapshots backed up
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
it seems that for some actions or in some circumstances, two minutes is
simply too short and the command aborts. Increase the default timeout to
10 minutes.
While it should give most commands enough time to finish, in case of a real
failure the procedure now takes up to 5 times longer, but IMHO thats an
OK tradeoff.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
this should make the api call much faster, since it is not reading
the whole catalog anymore
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>
For some parts of the ui, we only need the snapshot list from the catalog,
and reading the whole catalog (can be multiple hundred MiB) is not
really necessary.
Instead, we write the list of snapshots into a seperate .index file. This file
is generated on demand and is much smaller and thus faster to read.
a test for a valid status_page, one with excess data
(in the descriptor as well in the page as a whole)
and a test with too little data
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
if the library sends more data than advertised, simply cut it off,
but if it sends less data, bail out (depending on how much data is
missing, trying to parse it could lead to a panic, so bail out early)
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
in 'restore_archive', we reach that 'catalog.commit()' for
* every skipped snapshot (we already call 'commit_if_large' then before)
* every skipped chunk archive (no change in catalog since we do not read
the chunk archive in that case)
* after reading a catalog (no change in catalog)
in all other cases, we call 'commit_if_large' and return early,
meaning that the 'commit' there was executed too often and
unnecessary, so move it after the loop over the files, before
finishing the temporary database.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
instead of having a public start/end_chunk_archive and register_chunks,
simply expose a 'register_chunk_archive' method since we always have
a list of chunks anywhere we want to add them
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
instead of having the grid be as tall as possible and the containing
panel scroll. limit the grids height to the panel size and scroll the
grid.
this has two advantages:
* if a user has many slots, it is now possible to to navigate the other
grids to the position wanted
* having the grids scroll, means it can use extjs' buffered renderer,
which makes the view much more responsive (in case of hundreds of
slots)
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
We get the descriptor length from the library and use that in
'chunks_exact', which panics on length 0. Catch that case
and bail out, since that makes no sense here anyway.
This could prevent a panic, in case a library sends wrong data.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
debugging history showed that its surely nice to have more logs at
when stuff happens (and thus fails)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
now required as we always enforce lock files to be owned by the
backup user, and the restore code uses such code indirectly as the
REST server module is reused from proxmox-backup-server. Once that is
refactored out we may do away such things, but until then we need to
have a somewhat complete system env.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
instead of 'blindly' trusting the changer to deliver the fields written
in the specification, trust the length data it returns in the header.
we slice the descriptor data into equal sized chunks of the correct
size, then we do not have care bout the len and empty checks anymore
this also makes the code to read the rest of the page obsolete,
since the next descriptor is on the correct offset anyway
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
whether the kernel allows super-long names or weird
namespace prefixes is not our concern...
also the latter fails under fakeroot
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
We want to allow passing a secret not only directly through the
environment value, but also indirectly through a file path, an open
file descriptor or a command that can write it to standard out.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Wolfgang Bumiller
Dietmar Maurer
Thomas Lamprecht
Dominik Csapak
Lorenz Stechauner
Hannes Laimer
Fabian Ebner