this check is not perfect since there are often multiple device
nodes per drive/changer, but from the scan api we should return always
the same, so for an api user this should be enough
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
similar to the changers, create a listing at /tape/drive and put
the specific api calls below that
move the scan api call up one level
remove the status info from the config listing
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
so that an api user can see which drive belongs to which drivenum of a changer
for ones with multiple drives
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
add a changer listing here (copied from api2/config/changer)
and put the status and transfer api calls below that
puts the changer scan into the top level tape api
and removes the (now redundant) info from the config api path
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Currently there's not yet a node config and the WA config is
somewhat "tightly coupled" to the user entries in that
changing it can lock them all out, so for now I opted for
fewer reorganization and just use a digest of the
canonicalized config here, and keep it all in the tfa.json
file.
Experimentally using the flatten feature on the methods with
an`Updater` struct similar to what the api macro is supposed
to be able to derive on its own in the future.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
since the store is not a path parameter, we need to do manual instead of
schema checks. also dropping Datastore.Backup here
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
to allow on-demand scanning of remote datastores accessible for the
configured remote user.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
should cover all the current scenarios. remote server-side checks can't
be meaningfully unit-tested, but they are simple enough so should
hopefully never break.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
by requiring
- Datastore.Backup permission for target datastore
- Remote.Read permission for source remote/datastore
- Datastore.Prune if vanished snapshots should be removed
- Datastore.Modify if another user should own the freshly synced
snapshots
reading a sync job entry only requires knowing about both the source
remote and the target datastore.
note that this does not affect the Authid used to authenticate with the
remote, which of course also needs permissions to access the source
datastore.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
instead of hard-coding 'backup@pam'. this allows a bit more flexibility
(e.g., syncing to a datastore that can directly be used as restore
source) without overly complicating things.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>