instead of showing the snapshots directly under the pool and then the
media-sets, list the media-sets under the pool and only after the
snapshots
this has several advantages:
* we only have to read one set of tape catalog data on expand and not all of
them everytime (which does not scale)
* we can show media-sets without snapshots, this can happen when we
inventoried a set of tapes from another pbs instance, or lost the
catalog data somehow
the disadvantage is that one has to go look for the media set where the
snapshot is included, but we can solve this by implementing a search
function in the future (in the backend)
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
s/availabel/available/g
no semantic change at all
Signed-off-by: Oguz Bektas <o.bektas@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
we include all tasks whose type start with 'verif' in the type 'verify'
but if we want to actually show them in the pop-up, we have to reverse
map this back to 'verif', else there are tasks missing from there
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
and fix some issues from referenced named the same as their heading
they anchor too.
This should be fixed for real in our python plugin to scan for such
references, its probably a bug there, but as most of the problematic
ones where wrong (missing chapter prefix) anyway changing them is OK
too.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Co-Authored-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Tested-by: Oguz Bektas <o.bektas@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Oguz Bektas <o.bektas@proxmox.com>
since we do not show the tapes anymore in the BackupOverview, add
another panel where we can list the available tapes in the inventory
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
instead of grouping by tape (which is rarely interesting),
group by pool -> group -> id -> mediaset
this way a user looking for a backup of specific vm can do just that
we may want to have an additional view here were we list all snapshots
included in the selected media-set ?
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
mostly typical CRUD interface for managing drives, with an
additional actioncolumn containing some useful actions, e.g.
* reading the label
* show volume-statistics
* show the status
* label the inserted tape
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
this lets the users manage changers and lets them view the status of one
by having an overview of:
* slots for tapes
* import/export slots
* drives
lets the user:
* barcode-label all the tapes in the library
* move tapes between slots, into/out of drives
* show some basic info when a tape is loaded into a drive
* show the status of a drive
* clean a drive
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
shows all tapes with the relevant info
* which pool it belongs to
* what backups are on it
* which media-set
* location
* etc.
This is very rough, and maybe not the best way to display this information.
It may make sense to reverse the tree, i.e. having pools at top-level,
then media-sets, then tapes, then snapshots..
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
includes edit windows for
* Drives
* Changers
* Media Pools
* Labeling Media
* Making new Tape Backups
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Fix two things:
* do not reject the login promise when we get the abort DOMException
error
* safely save the original challenge string as we work on a reference
here and avoid to convert to a UInt8 array twice to avoid an
exception.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
simple heuristic for those people who always prefer a specific TFA
method and have the others only as backup.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Improve UX by avoiding the need to click some buttons twice, or
calling TOTP and Recovery codes both "OTP" codes and showing multiple
buttons, with all having the same goal "submit a TFA token" at the
same time.
Instead use a tab panel with a single submit button.
WebAuthn can and should be still improved, but that can be OK as
followup.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
userid parameter needs to be properly encoded when shown on the browser
Signed-off-by: Oguz Bektas <o.bektas@proxmox.com>
Reviewed-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
