- remove chrono dependency
- depend on proxmox 0.3.8
- remove epoch_now, epoch_now_u64 and epoch_now_f64
- remove tm_editor (moved to proxmox crate)
- use new helpers from proxmox 0.3.8
* epoch_i64 and epoch_f64
* parse_rfc3339
* epoch_to_rfc3339_utc
* strftime_local
- BackupDir changes:
* store epoch and rfc3339 string instead of DateTime
* backup_time_to_string now return a Result
* remove unnecessary TryFrom<(BackupGroup, i64)> for BackupDir
- DynamicIndexHeader: change ctime to i64
- FixedIndexHeader: change ctime to i64
this implements parsing and calculating calendarevents that have a
basic date component (year-mon-day) with the usual syntax options
(*, ranges, lists)
and some special events:
monthly
yearly/annually (like systemd)
quarterly
semiannually,semi-annually (like systemd)
includes some regression tests
the ~ syntax for days (the last x days of the month) is not yet
implemented
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
instead of using 'as' and silently converting wrong,
use the TryInto trait and raise an error if we cannot convert
this should only happen if we have a negative year,
but this is expected (we do not want schedules from before the year 0)
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
add_* are modeled after add_days
subtract one for set_mon to have a consistent interface for all fields
(i.e. getter/setter return/expect the 'real' number, not the ones
in the tm struct)
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
the tm struct contains the year - 1900 but we added that
if we want to use the libc normalization correctly, the tm struct
must have the correct year in it, else the computations for timezones,
etc. fail
instead add a getter that adds the years and a setter that subtracts it again
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
if we give multiple options/ranges for a value, e.g.
2,4,8
we always choose the biggest, instead of the smallest that is next
this happens because in DateTimeValue::find_next(value)
'next' can be set multiple times and we set it when the new
value was *bigger* than the last found 'next' value, when in reality
we have to choose the *smallest* next we can find
reverse the comparison operator to fix this
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
we never passed 'false' to it anyway so remove it
(we can add it again if we should ever need it)
also remove the adding of wday (gets normalized anyway)
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
we want to use dates for the calendarspec, and with that there are some
impossible combinations that cannot be detected during parsing
(e.g. some datetimes do not exist in some timezones, and the timezone
can change after setting the schedule)
so finding no timestamp is not an error anymore but a valid result
we omit logging in that case (since it is not an error anymore)
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
mktime/gmtime can normalize time and even can handle special timezone
cases like the fact that the time 2:30 on specific day/timezone combos
do not exists
we have to convert the signature of all functions that use
normalize_time since mktime/gmtime can return an EOVERFLOW
but if this happens there is no way we can find a good time anyway
since normalize_time will always set wday according to the rest of the
time, remove set_wday
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
while it was correct, there was no measurable speed gain
(a benchmark yielded 2.8 ms for a spec that did not find a timestamp either way)
so remove it for simpler code
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
While we do not yet support the date specs for CalendarEvent the left
out "weekly" special expression[0] dies not requires that support.
It is specified to be equivalent with `Mon *-*-* 00:00:00` [0] and
this can be implemented with the weekday and time support we already
have.
[0]: https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.time.html#Calendar%20Events
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
two things were wrong here:
* the range (x..y) does not include y, so the range
(day_num+1..6) goes from (day_num+1) to 5 (but sunday is 6)
* WeekDays.bits() does not return the 'day_num' of that day, but
the bit value (e.g. 64 for SUNDAY) but was treated as the index of
the day of the week
to fix this, we drop the map to WeekDays and use the 'indices'
directly
this patch makes the test work again
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
