It is not necessary, so avoid it. The client can now be used
with multiple threads (without using a Mutex).
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>
the 'utc' flag is now contained in the event itself and not given
as a flag to 'compute_next_event' anymore
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>
- imported pbs-api-types/src/common_regex.rs from old proxmox crate
- use hex crate to generate/parse hex digest
- remove all reference to proxmox crate (use proxmox-sys and
proxmox-serde instead)
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>
we even use that for basically all the related schema names, "groups"
allone is just rather not so telling, i.e., "groups" what?
While due to the additive nature of `group-filter` is not the best
possible name for passing multiple arguments on the CLI (the web-ui
can present this more UX-friendly anyway) due to possible confusion
about if the filter act like AND vs OR it can be documented and even
if a user is confused they still are safe on more being synced than
less. Also, the original param name wasn't really _that_ better in
that regards
Dietmar also suggested to use singular for the CLI option, while
there can be more they're passed over repeating the option, each with
a single filter.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
and add a completion handler to complete the backup groups
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
without requiring workarounds based on ownership and limited
visibility/access.
if a group filter is set, remove_vanished will only consider filtered
groups for removal to prevent concurrent disjunct filters from trashing
eachother's synced groups.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Reviewed-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
some custom ACME endpoints do not have TOS, interpret this as
'the user has accepted the TOS', like we do for PVE.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
Storing much more data points now got get better graphs.
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
allow the current thread to do some other work in-between
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
And initialize only with proxmox-backup-proxy. Other binaries dont need it.
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Append pending changes in a simple text based format that allows for
lockless appends as long as we stay below 4 KiB data per write.
Apply the journal every 30 minutes and on daemon startup.
Note that we do not ensure that the journal is synced, this is a
perfomance optimization we can make as the kernel defaults to
writeback in-flight data every 30s (sysctl vm/dirty_expire_centisecs)
anyway, so we lose at max half a minute of data on a crash, here one
should have in mind that we normally expose 1 minute as finest
granularity anyway, so not really much lost.
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
send_command serializes everything so it cannot be used to send a
raw, optimized command. Normally that means we get an error like
> 'unable to parse parameters (expected json object)'
when used that way.
Switch over to send_raw_command which does not re-serializes the
command.
Fixes: 45b8a032 ("refactor send_command")
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
until now, we manually polled the systemd service state during a reload
so that the sd_notify messages get processed in the correct order
(RELOAD(old) -> MAINPID(old) -> READY(new))
with systemd >= 246 there is now 'sd_notify_barrier' which
blocks until systemd processed all prior messages
with that change, the daemon does not need to know the service name anymore
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
