It was not actually bad, so they're quite opinionated to be honest,
but at least xtypes props must go first and variable declaration
should try to be as near as possible to the actual use as long as
code stays sensible readable/short.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
a restore does not change the tape content, so a reload has no benefit here.
since we're touching those lines, change to 'autoShow' property
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
by including the new snapshotselector. If a whole media-set is to be
restored, select all snapshots
to achieve this, we drop the 'restoreid' and 'datastores' properties
for the restore window, and replace them by a 'prefilter' object
(with 'store' and 'snapshot' properties)
to be able to show the snapshots, we now have to always load the
content of that media-set, so drop the short-circuit if we have
the datastores already.
change the layout of the restore window into a two-step window
so that the first tab is the selection what to restore, and on the
second tab the user chooses where to restore (drive, datastore, etc.)
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
instead of having them in the toolbar. This makes the UI more consistent
with the datastore content view.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
by adding a custom field (grid) where the user can select
a target datastore for each source datastore on tape
if we have not loaded the content of the media set yet,
we have to load it on window open to get the list of datastores
on the tape
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
since we can now backup multiple datastores in the same media-set,
we show the datastores as first level below that
the final tree structucture looks like this:
tapepool A
- media set 1
- datastore I
- tape x
- ct/100
- ct/100/2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
For tapes with many snapshots/group, a simple list of them is too
big. Instead, add a level for just the groups, this makes searching
for a specific backup much easier.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
but auto-expand them, so no additional click is necessary
this shows the user which tapes are involved for the media sets
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
if a catalog is missing (or the loading otherwise throws an error), show
the error message in a msg box instead of a mask. this way a user can
still navigate the tree
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
instead of showing the snapshots directly under the pool and then the
media-sets, list the media-sets under the pool and only after the
snapshots
this has several advantages:
* we only have to read one set of tape catalog data on expand and not all of
them everytime (which does not scale)
* we can show media-sets without snapshots, this can happen when we
inventoried a set of tapes from another pbs instance, or lost the
catalog data somehow
the disadvantage is that one has to go look for the media set where the
snapshot is included, but we can solve this by implementing a search
function in the future (in the backend)
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
instead of grouping by tape (which is rarely interesting),
group by pool -> group -> id -> mediaset
this way a user looking for a backup of specific vm can do just that
we may want to have an additional view here were we list all snapshots
included in the selected media-set ?
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
shows all tapes with the relevant info
* which pool it belongs to
* what backups are on it
* which media-set
* location
* etc.
This is very rough, and maybe not the best way to display this information.
It may make sense to reverse the tree, i.e. having pools at top-level,
then media-sets, then tapes, then snapshots..
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Thomas Lamprecht
Dominik Csapak
Dietmar Maurer