instead of grouping by tape (which is rarely interesting),
group by pool -> group -> id -> mediaset
this way a user looking for a backup of specific vm can do just that
we may want to have an additional view here were we list all snapshots
included in the selected media-set ?
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
mostly typical CRUD interface for managing drives, with an
additional actioncolumn containing some useful actions, e.g.
* reading the label
* show volume-statistics
* show the status
* label the inserted tape
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
this lets the users manage changers and lets them view the status of one
by having an overview of:
* slots for tapes
* import/export slots
* drives
lets the user:
* barcode-label all the tapes in the library
* move tapes between slots, into/out of drives
* show some basic info when a tape is loaded into a drive
* show the status of a drive
* clean a drive
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
shows all tapes with the relevant info
* which pool it belongs to
* what backups are on it
* which media-set
* location
* etc.
This is very rough, and maybe not the best way to display this information.
It may make sense to reverse the tree, i.e. having pools at top-level,
then media-sets, then tapes, then snapshots..
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
includes edit windows for
* Drives
* Changers
* Media Pools
* Labeling Media
* Making new Tape Backups
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Fix two things:
* do not reject the login promise when we get the abort DOMException
error
* safely save the original challenge string as we work on a reference
here and avoid to convert to a UInt8 array twice to avoid an
exception.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
simple heuristic for those people who always prefer a specific TFA
method and have the others only as backup.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Improve UX by avoiding the need to click some buttons twice, or
calling TOTP and Recovery codes both "OTP" codes and showing multiple
buttons, with all having the same goal "submit a TFA token" at the
same time.
Instead use a tab panel with a single submit button.
WebAuthn can and should be still improved, but that can be OK as
followup.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
userid parameter needs to be properly encoded when shown on the browser
Signed-off-by: Oguz Bektas <o.bektas@proxmox.com>
Reviewed-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
This is wrong most of the time, when not loading the web interface
with valid credentials, and thus some checks or defaults did not
evaluated correctly when the underlying value was only set later.
Needs to be set on component creation only, this can be done through
initComponent, even listeners, view controllers or cbind closures.
Use the latter, as all affected components already use cbind.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
present all relevant information about the TFA token to be removed,
so that a user can make a better decision.
Rework layout to match our commonly used style.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Clarify that the password of the user one wants to add TFA too is
required, which is not necessarily the one of the current logged in
user. Use an empty text for that.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
