we need this, because we append the port to this to get a target url
e.g. we print
format!("https://{}:8007/", address)
if address is now an ipv6 (e.g. fe80::1) it would become
https://fe80::1:8007/ which is a valid ipv6 on its own
by using square brackets we get:
https://[fe80::1]:8007/ which now connects to the correct ip/port
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
since len() and MAX_INDEX_TASKS are both usize, they underflow
instead of getting negative values
instead check the sizes and set them accordingly
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
this starts a task once a day at "00:00" that rotates the task log
archive if it is bigger than 500k
if we want, we can make the schedule/size limit/etc. configurable,
but for now it's ok to set fixed values for that
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
since there are no users of this anymore and we now have a nicer
TaskListInfoIterator to use, we can drop this function
this also means that 'update_active_workers' does not need to return
a list anymore since we never used that result besides in
read_task_list
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
this means that limiting with epoch now works correctly
also change the api type to i64, since that is what the starttime is
saved as
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
this makes the filtering/limiting much nicer and readable
since we now have potentially an 'infinite' amount of tasks we iterate over,
and cannot now beforehand how many there are, we return the total count
as always 1 higher then requested iff we are not at the end (this is
the case when the amount of entries is smaller than the requested limit)
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
this is an iterator that reads/parses/updates the task list as
necessary and returns the tasks in descending order (newest first)
it does this by using our logrotate iterator and using a vecdeque
we can use this to iterate over all tasks, even if they are in the
archive and even if the archive is logrotated but only read
as much as we need
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
instead of removing tasks beyond the 1000 that are in the index
write them into an archive file by appending them at the end
this way we can later still read them
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
one for only the active tasks and one for up to 1000 finished tasks
factor out the parsing of a task file (we will later need this again)
and use iterator combinators for easier code
we now sort the tasks ascending (this will become important in a later patch)
but reverse (for now) it to keep compatibility
this code also omits the converting into an intermittent hash
since it cannot really happen that we have duplicate tasks in this list
(since the call is locked by an flock, and it is the only place where we
write into the lists)
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
this is a helper to rotate and iterate over log files
there is an iterator for open filehandles as well as
only the filename
also it has the possibilty to rotate them
for compression, zstd is used
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
fixed-width navi/toc links were not switched in color for small width
displays, and thus they were barely readable as the background
switches to dark for small widths.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
I do not found another way to disable inclusion in the sidebar...
The genindex information is alredy provided through glossary
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
also changes:
* correct comment about reset (replace 'sync' with 'action')
* check schedule change correctly (only when it is actually changed)
with this changes, we can drop the 'lookup_last_worker' method
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
we rely on the jobstate handling to write the error of the worker
into its state file, but we used '?' here in a block which does not
return the error to the block, but to the function/closure instead
so if a prune job failed because of such an '?', we did not write
into the statefile and got a wrong state there
instead use our try_block! macro that wraps the code in a closure
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Dominik Csapak
Dietmar Maurer
Wolfgang Bumiller
Thomas Lamprecht