It may make sense in the future, e.g., if the built-in standalone
type is not enough, e.g., as HTTP**s**, HTTP 2 or even QUIC (HTTP 3)
is wanted in some setups, but for now there's no scenario where one
would profit from adding a new HTTP plugin, especially as it requires
the `data` property to be set, which makes no sense..
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
found and semi-manually replaced by using:
codespell -L mut -L crate -i 3 -w
Mostly in comments, but also email notification and two occurrences
of misspelled 'reserved' struct member, which where not used and
cargo build did not complain about the change, soo ...
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
by adding the existing credential id to the 'excludeCredentials' list
this prevents the browser from registering a token twice, which
lets authentication fail on some browser/token combinations
(e.g. onlykey/solokey+chromium)
while is seems this is currently a bug in chromium, in a future spec
update the underlying behaviour should be better defined, making this
an authenticator bug
also explicitly catch registering errors and show appropriate error messages
0: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1087642
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
the current default is 'Preferred', which is not really useful, as the
(web) client can simply change this to discouraged, since the
webauthn_rs crate does not verify the 'user_verified' bit of the
response in that case
setting this to 'Required' is not really useful either at the moment,
since a user can have a mix of different authenticators that may or
may not support user verification
there is ongoing discussion in the crate how to handle that[0]
we could probably expose this setting(discouraged/required) to the user/admin
and save it to the credential and allow only registering credentials
of the same type or filter them out on login (i.e. if there is an
authenticator that can handle userVerification, require it)
in any case, the current default is not helpful for security, but
makes loggin in harder, since the key will by default want to verify
the user
0: https://github.com/kanidm/webauthn-rs/pull/49
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
chunk_stream one can be collapsed, since split == split_to with at set
to buffer.len() anyway.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
and allow it in the one case where the entry loop is intended, but the
code is not yet implemented fully.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
While the user chosen description is not allowed to be
empty, we do leave it empty for recovery keys, as a "dummy
description" makes little sense...
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
Currently there's not yet a node config and the WA config is
somewhat "tightly coupled" to the user entries in that
changing it can lock them all out, so for now I opted for
fewer reorganization and just use a digest of the
canonicalized config here, and keep it all in the tfa.json
file.
Experimentally using the flatten feature on the methods with
an`Updater` struct similar to what the api macro is supposed
to be able to derive on its own in the future.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
document all public things, add some doc links and make some
previously-public things only available for test cases or within the
crate:
previously public, now private:
- AclTreeNode::extract_user_roles (we have extract_roles())
- AclTreeNode::extract_group_roles (same)
- AclTreeNode::delete_group_role (exists on AclTree)
- AclTreeNode::delete_user_role (same)
- AclTreeNode::insert_group_role (same)
- AclTreeNode::insert_user_role (same)
- AclTree::write_config (we have save_config())
- AclTree::load (we have config()/cached_config())
previously public, now crate-internal:
- AclTree::from_raw (only used by tests)
- split_acl_path (used by some test binaries)
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
by requiring
- Datastore.Backup permission for target datastore
- Remote.Read permission for source remote/datastore
- Datastore.Prune if vanished snapshots should be removed
- Datastore.Modify if another user should own the freshly synced
snapshots
reading a sync job entry only requires knowing about both the source
remote and the target datastore.
note that this does not affect the Authid used to authenticate with the
remote, which of course also needs permissions to access the source
datastore.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
instead of hard-coding 'backup@pam'. this allows a bit more flexibility
(e.g., syncing to a datastore that can directly be used as restore
source) without overly complicating things.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
it's not used anywhere, and not needed either until the day we might
implement push syncs.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
for verifying a whole datastore. Datastore.Backup now allows verifying
only backups owned by the triggering user.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
in most generic places. this is accompanied by a change in
RpcEnvironment to purposefully break existing call sites.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
