instead of silently discarding the error, else the user might be
confused because nothing happened
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
by adding the existing credential id to the 'excludeCredentials' list
this prevents the browser from registering a token twice, which
lets authentication fail on some browser/token combinations
(e.g. onlykey/solokey+chromium)
while is seems this is currently a bug in chromium, in a future spec
update the underlying behaviour should be better defined, making this
an authenticator bug
also explicitly catch registering errors and show appropriate error messages
0: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1087642
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
even if the options *could* be set in the frontend, the backend
actually has to do validation of those settings, thus we should not
make that a browser setting
additionally, having the value 'preferred' does not actually make sense,
since it does not add any security (the backend skips the
userverification check then)
This reverts commit aca4c2b5a9.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
the current default is 'Preferred', which is not really useful, as the
(web) client can simply change this to discouraged, since the
webauthn_rs crate does not verify the 'user_verified' bit of the
response in that case
setting this to 'Required' is not really useful either at the moment,
since a user can have a mix of different authenticators that may or
may not support user verification
there is ongoing discussion in the crate how to handle that[0]
we could probably expose this setting(discouraged/required) to the user/admin
and save it to the credential and allow only registering credentials
of the same type or filter them out on login (i.e. if there is an
authenticator that can handle userVerification, require it)
in any case, the current default is not helpful for security, but
makes loggin in harder, since the key will by default want to verify
the user
0: https://github.com/kanidm/webauthn-rs/pull/49
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
The previous description in the docs was false. The restore command
with the pattern parameter will search the entire backup archive,
regardless of pwd.
Signed-off-by: Dylan Whyte <d.whyte@proxmox.com>
If the usage of a datastore did not change, we did not
return an estimate. The ui interpreted this as 'not enough data', but
it should actually be 'never'.
Fixing this by always setting the estimate first to 0 and overwriting
if we successfully calculated one, and checking for 'undefined' in the ui.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
since the status api call blocks the drive, it only makes sense to do
when the drive is idle.
so do not reload on activate, but when the drive changes the first
time from busy to idle
also disable the reload button when the drive is busy
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
we test for the config key in the API so it makes sense to have as
test here too. Actually it would be better if we'd have a expect
Value defined here and enforce that it matches, but better than
nothing.
Fix the input for test 1, where tabs got replaced by spaces, as else
it fails
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
For tapes with many snapshots/group, a simple list of them is too
big. Instead, add a level for just the groups, this makes searching
for a specific backup much easier.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
since reload is an async function, the view can be destroyed during
any 'await' point. Subsequent accesses to the view will fail, and we
will land in the catch. Check there if the view is destroyed, and
do not raise an error with the user then
also cancel any outstanding timer on 'deactivate' and 'destroy'
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
because we now select it directly in the left-hand tree
so we have to adapt the changer to the one set by the router
and not by the drop down field
and remove it from the TapeManagement tabpanel
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
and only check TapeManagement once in the init function
we now have 2 updatestores that update individually
(one for datastores, one for drives/changers)
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
by generalizing the isDataStorePath logic to a 'parseRouterPath'.
We still have to keep the isDataStore logic for tabpanel handling,
If we add tabs to changer-/drivestatus panels, we have to adapt
that too.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
