when executing this code as non-root, we use sg-tape-cmd (a setuid binary)
to execute various ioctls on the tape device
we give the command the open tape device fd as stdin, but did not
dup it, so the std::process:Stdio handle closed it on drop,
which let subsequent operation on that file fail (since it was closed)
fix it by dup'ing it before giving it to the command, and also refactor
the calling code, so that we do not forget to do this
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
we did this for 'mtx', but missed it for the sg_pt_changer code
refactor it into the MtxStatus strut, and call it from both
code paths
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
mostly typical CRUD interface for managing drives, with an
additional actioncolumn containing some useful actions, e.g.
* reading the label
* show volume-statistics
* show the status
* label the inserted tape
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
this lets the users manage changers and lets them view the status of one
by having an overview of:
* slots for tapes
* import/export slots
* drives
lets the user:
* barcode-label all the tapes in the library
* move tapes between slots, into/out of drives
* show some basic info when a tape is loaded into a drive
* show the status of a drive
* clean a drive
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
shows all tapes with the relevant info
* which pool it belongs to
* what backups are on it
* which media-set
* location
* etc.
This is very rough, and maybe not the best way to display this information.
It may make sense to reverse the tree, i.e. having pools at top-level,
then media-sets, then tapes, then snapshots..
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
includes edit windows for
* Drives
* Changers
* Media Pools
* Labeling Media
* Making new Tape Backups
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
this check is not perfect since there are often multiple device
nodes per drive/changer, but from the scan api we should return always
the same, so for an api user this should be enough
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
so that an api user can get the drives belonging to a changer
without having to parse the config listing themselves
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
similar to the changers, create a listing at /tape/drive and put
the specific api calls below that
move the scan api call up one level
remove the status info from the config listing
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
so that an api user can see which drive belongs to which drivenum of a changer
for ones with multiple drives
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Fix two things:
* do not reject the login promise when we get the abort DOMException
error
* safely save the original challenge string as we work on a reference
here and avoid to convert to a UInt8 array twice to avoid an
exception.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
simple heuristic for those people who always prefer a specific TFA
method and have the others only as backup.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Improve UX by avoiding the need to click some buttons twice, or
calling TOTP and Recovery codes both "OTP" codes and showing multiple
buttons, with all having the same goal "submit a TFA token" at the
same time.
Instead use a tab panel with a single submit button.
WebAuthn can and should be still improved, but that can be OK as
followup.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Dietmar Maurer
Dominik Csapak
Thomas Lamprecht