in most generic places. this is accompanied by a change in
RpcEnvironment to purposefully break existing call sites.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Previously only Datastore.Modify was required for creating a new
datastore.
But, that endpoint allows one to pass an arbitrary path, of which all
parent directories will be created, this can allow any user with the
"Datastore Admin" role on "/datastores" to do some damage to the
system. Further, it is effectively a side channel for revealing the
systems directory structure through educated guessing and error
handling.
Add a new privilege "Datastore.Allocate" which, for now, is used
specifically for the create datastore API endpoint.
Add it only to the "Admin" role.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
also changes:
* correct comment about reset (replace 'sync' with 'action')
* check schedule change correctly (only when it is actually changed)
with this changes, we can drop the 'lookup_last_worker' method
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
like the sync jobs, so that if an admin configures a schedule it
really starts the next time that time is reached not immediately
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
filtered by those they are privileged enough to read individually. this
allows such users to configure prune/GC schedules via the GUI (the API
already allowed it previously).
permission-wise, a user with this privilege can already:
- list all stores they have access to (returns just name/comment)
- read the config of each store they have access to individually
(returns full config of that datastore + digest of whole config)
but combines them to
- read configs of all datastores they have access to (returns full
config of those datastores + digest of whole config)
user that have AUDIT on just /datastore without propagate can now no
longer read all configurations (but this could be added it back, it just
seems to make little sense to me).
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
It's a bit dangerous as it points to all the saved backups, so they
would be seemingly lost after updating the path.
Follow our logic from other products, e.g. in PVE we do not allow to
update the backing path/location of a storage either for similar
reasons.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
for now forbid all control characters[0] in the comment value, the
section config writer cannot cope with newlines in the value, it
writes them out literally, allowing "injection" or breaking the whole
config.
In the webinterface use also a textfield, not a textarea.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
