instead of using 'as' and silently converting wrong,
use the TryInto trait and raise an error if we cannot convert
this should only happen if we have a negative year,
but this is expected (we do not want schedules from before the year 0)
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
if we give multiple options/ranges for a value, e.g.
2,4,8
we always choose the biggest, instead of the smallest that is next
this happens because in DateTimeValue::find_next(value)
'next' can be set multiple times and we set it when the new
value was *bigger* than the last found 'next' value, when in reality
we have to choose the *smallest* next we can find
reverse the comparison operator to fix this
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
we never passed 'false' to it anyway so remove it
(we can add it again if we should ever need it)
also remove the adding of wday (gets normalized anyway)
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
we want to use dates for the calendarspec, and with that there are some
impossible combinations that cannot be detected during parsing
(e.g. some datetimes do not exist in some timezones, and the timezone
can change after setting the schedule)
so finding no timestamp is not an error anymore but a valid result
we omit logging in that case (since it is not an error anymore)
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
mktime/gmtime can normalize time and even can handle special timezone
cases like the fact that the time 2:30 on specific day/timezone combos
do not exists
we have to convert the signature of all functions that use
normalize_time since mktime/gmtime can return an EOVERFLOW
but if this happens there is no way we can find a good time anyway
since normalize_time will always set wday according to the rest of the
time, remove set_wday
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
while it was correct, there was no measurable speed gain
(a benchmark yielded 2.8 ms for a spec that did not find a timestamp either way)
so remove it for simpler code
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
two things were wrong here:
* the range (x..y) does not include y, so the range
(day_num+1..6) goes from (day_num+1) to 5 (but sunday is 6)
* WeekDays.bits() does not return the 'day_num' of that day, but
the bit value (e.g. 64 for SUNDAY) but was treated as the index of
the day of the week
to fix this, we drop the map to WeekDays and use the 'indices'
directly
this patch makes the test work again
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
