we forgot to correclty send the network value as we changed from
the radiogroup to a simple text field
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
here's to note that the radio-group was my idea, Dominik just
executed it, nicely that is.
But, the panel looks a bit glitchy layout wise as with that and the
bandwidth fields (maybe we should render their unit inline) the
vertical alignments were all over the place.
So for now make it a simple text field and throw in a tooltip for
good measurement
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
delete on update and avoid sending an empty string in any case, the
backend does not likes that much.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
adds a list of traffic control rules (with their current usage)
and let the user add/edit/remove them
the edit window currently has a grid for timeframes to add/remove
with input fields for start/endtime and checkboxes for the days
there are still some improvements possible, like having a seperate
grid for networks (the input field is maybe too small), or
optimizing consecutive days to a range (e.g. mon..wed instead of mon,tue,wed)
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
like for manual pulls, but persisted in the sync job config and visible
in the relevant GUI parts.
GUI is read-only for now (and defaults to no filtering on creation), as
this is a rather advanced feature that requires a complex GUI to be
user-friendly (regex-freeform, type-combobox, remote group scanning +
selector with additional freeform input).
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Reviewed-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
since the api call always starts a real worker, we cannot have a
preview. It would also be very hard to show that for all groups in a
non-confusing way. We reuse the pbsPruneInputPanel and add the dry-run
field there conditionally.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
The api2 one passes the whole response (for more flexibility) on
reject, so we need to adapt to that.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
so that longer running creates (e.g. a slow storage), does not
run in a timeout and we can follow its creation
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>
when changin the remote, there is a high chance that there are different
datastores, and if a user does not pay attention, now the first store
of the new remote is selected, instead of the one with the same name
disable autoSelect and let the user manually select a remote datastore
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
by adding the existing credential id to the 'excludeCredentials' list
this prevents the browser from registering a token twice, which
lets authentication fail on some browser/token combinations
(e.g. onlykey/solokey+chromium)
while is seems this is currently a bug in chromium, in a future spec
update the underlying behaviour should be better defined, making this
an authenticator bug
also explicitly catch registering errors and show appropriate error messages
0: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1087642
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
even if the options *could* be set in the frontend, the backend
actually has to do validation of those settings, thus we should not
make that a browser setting
additionally, having the value 'preferred' does not actually make sense,
since it does not add any security (the backend skips the
userverification check then)
This reverts commit aca4c2b5a9.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
some fido2/webauthn keys can have a pin, and the client can request
a mode for the user verification.
'default' (no value set), lets the browser/device decide if the user has to
enter the pin of the device
'discouraged' requests that the user should not need to enter the pin
'preferred' requests that the user should need to enter the pin (if possible)
since we use webauthn only as a 2nd factor, having the user enter
the device pin on login may seem too much hassle for some users, so
give them the option
since this is a client option anyway, do not save it in the backend, but
in the browser local storage
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
mostly copied from pve (for now; will refactor when i add it to
pmg too (soon)) without the pve specific features like dashboard
storages
contains some eslint fixes comparing to pves window
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
userid parameter needs to be properly encoded when shown on the browser
Signed-off-by: Oguz Bektas <o.bektas@proxmox.com>
Reviewed-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
This is wrong most of the time, when not loading the web interface
with valid credentials, and thus some checks or defaults did not
evaluated correctly when the underlying value was only set later.
Needs to be set on component creation only, this can be done through
initComponent, even listeners, view controllers or cbind closures.
Use the latter, as all affected components already use cbind.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Clarify that the password of the user one wants to add TFA too is
required, which is not necessarily the one of the current logged in
user. Use an empty text for that.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
the password field should not be indented differently than the rest of
the fields, and we never have a border on the panels
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Thomas Lamprecht
Dominik Csapak
Fabian Grünbichler
Wolfgang Bumiller
Fabian Ebner
Stefan Reiter
Oguz Bektas