we even use that for basically all the related schema names, "groups"
allone is just rather not so telling, i.e., "groups" what?
While due to the additive nature of `group-filter` is not the best
possible name for passing multiple arguments on the CLI (the web-ui
can present this more UX-friendly anyway) due to possible confusion
about if the filter act like AND vs OR it can be documented and even
if a user is confused they still are safe on more being synced than
less. Also, the original param name wasn't really _that_ better in
that regards
Dietmar also suggested to use singular for the CLI option, while
there can be more they're passed over repeating the option, each with
a single filter.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
like for manual pulls, but persisted in the sync job config and visible
in the relevant GUI parts.
GUI is read-only for now (and defaults to no filtering on creation), as
this is a rather advanced feature that requires a complex GUI to be
user-friendly (regex-freeform, type-combobox, remote group scanning +
selector with additional freeform input).
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Reviewed-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Factor out open_backup_lockfile() method to acquire locks owned by
user backup with permission 0660.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
when a user updates a job schedule, we want to save that point in time
to calculate future runs, otherwise when a user updates a schedule to
a time that would have been between the last run and 'now' the
schedule is triggered instantly
for example:
schedule 08:00
last run today 08:00
now it is 12:00
before this patch:
update schedule to 11:00
-> triggered instantly since we calculate from 08:00
after this patch:
update schedule to 11:00
-> triggered tomorrow 11:00 since we calculate from today 12:00
the change in the enum type is ok, since by default serde does not
error on unknown fields and the new field is optional
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
should cover all the current scenarios. remote server-side checks can't
be meaningfully unit-tested, but they are simple enough so should
hopefully never break.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
by requiring
- Datastore.Backup permission for target datastore
- Remote.Read permission for source remote/datastore
- Datastore.Prune if vanished snapshots should be removed
- Datastore.Modify if another user should own the freshly synced
snapshots
reading a sync job entry only requires knowing about both the source
remote and the target datastore.
note that this does not affect the Authid used to authenticate with the
remote, which of course also needs permissions to access the source
datastore.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
instead of hard-coding 'backup@pam'. this allows a bit more flexibility
(e.g., syncing to a datastore that can directly be used as restore
source) without overly complicating things.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
it really is not necessary, since the only time we are interested in
loading the state from the file is when we list it, and there
we use JobState::load directly to avoid the lock
we still need to create the file on syncjob creation though, so
that we have the correct time for the schedule
to do this we add a new create_state_file that overwrites it on creation
of a syncjob
for safety, we subtract 30 seconds from the in-memory state in case
the statefile is missing
since we call create_state_file from proxmox-backup-api,
we have to chown the lock file after creating to the backup user,
else the sync job scheduling cannot aquire the lock
also we remove the lock file on statefile removal
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
