when we do a prune during a tape backup, do not cancel the tape backup,
but continue with a warning
the task still fails and prompts the user to check the log
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Try once first to load the correct tape before sending an email to
insert the correct one. This way, the admin does not get a mail
if the correct tape is already inserted.
Also include the error we got that prompted the email to insert the
tape. This means that if the admin gets prompted to insert e.g.
"FOO" but inserts "BAR", he'll get an email that the wrong
tape is inserted.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
by adding the existing credential id to the 'excludeCredentials' list
this prevents the browser from registering a token twice, which
lets authentication fail on some browser/token combinations
(e.g. onlykey/solokey+chromium)
while is seems this is currently a bug in chromium, in a future spec
update the underlying behaviour should be better defined, making this
an authenticator bug
also explicitly catch registering errors and show appropriate error messages
0: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1087642
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
the current default is 'Preferred', which is not really useful, as the
(web) client can simply change this to discouraged, since the
webauthn_rs crate does not verify the 'user_verified' bit of the
response in that case
setting this to 'Required' is not really useful either at the moment,
since a user can have a mix of different authenticators that may or
may not support user verification
there is ongoing discussion in the crate how to handle that[0]
we could probably expose this setting(discouraged/required) to the user/admin
and save it to the credential and allow only registering credentials
of the same type or filter them out on login (i.e. if there is an
authenticator that can handle userVerification, require it)
in any case, the current default is not helpful for security, but
makes loggin in harder, since the key will by default want to verify
the user
0: https://github.com/kanidm/webauthn-rs/pull/49
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
If the usage of a datastore did not change, we did not
return an estimate. The ui interpreted this as 'not enough data', but
it should actually be 'never'.
Fixing this by always setting the estimate first to 0 and overwriting
if we successfully calculated one, and checking for 'undefined' in the ui.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
we test for the config key in the API so it makes sense to have as
test here too. Actually it would be better if we'd have a expect
Value defined here and enforce that it matches, but better than
nothing.
Fix the input for test 1, where tabs got replaced by spaces, as else
it fails
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
As 20s is really not that high, especially for loaded setups one is
connected to through a spotty network (looking at you ÖBB railnet)
and gets latency spikes of 5 - 10s for some minutes at a time..
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
since the PUT api call is using the 'Updater', the 'id' parameter is
already encoded in there, tripping up the api verify tests with
'Duplicate keys found in AllOf schema: id'
"fixing" it by removing the explicit id from the api call and
taking it from the Updater (and failing if it does not exists there;
even though that should never happen)
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
a 'leaf' node is every file *except* directories, so we have
to reverse the logtic here
this fixes the pxar.didx browser in the web ui
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
instead of filling them with zeroes
this fixes an issue where we could not restore a container with large
sparse files in the backup (e.g. a 10GiB sparse file in a container
with a 8GiB disk)
if the last operation of the copy was a seek, we need to truncate
the file to the correct size (seek beyond filesize does not change it)
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
those calls could also block, so we have to run them in a blocking
tokio task, as to not block the current thread
nice side effect is that we now also update the state for that
drive in those instances
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
simply writes into/reads from a file in /run, we will use this
for writing the upid (or potential other states) per drive
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
...including common schemata, connect(), extract_*() and completion
functions.
For later use with proxmox-file-restore binary.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
...to take advantage of the aio::Encoder from the pxar create.
Rather straightforward conversion, but does require getting rid of
references in the Archiver struct, and thus has to be given the Mutex
for the catalog directly. The callback is boxed.
archive_dir_contents can call itself recursively, and thus needs to
return a boxed future.
Users are adjusted, namely PxarBackupStream is converted to use an
Abortable future instead of a thread so it supports async in its handler
function, and the pxar bin create_archive is converted to an async API
function. One test case is made to just use 'block_on'.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
to extract some subdirectory of a pxar into a given target
this will be used in the client
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
we will reuse that code in the client, so we need to move it to
where we can access it from the client
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
[clippy fixes]
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
we will reuse that later in the client, so we need it somewhere
we can use from there
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
[add strongly typed ArchiveEntry and put api code into helpers.rs]
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
Currently useful only for single file restore, but kept generic enough
to use any compatible API endpoint over a virtio-vsock[0,1] interface.
VsockClient is adapted and slimmed down from HttpClient.
A tower-compatible VsockConnector is implemented, using a wrapped
UnixStream as transfer. The UnixStream has to be wrapped in a custom
struct to implement 'Connection', Async{Read,Write} are simply forwarded
directly to the underlying stream.
[0] https://www.man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/vsock.7.html
[1] https://wiki.qemu.org/Features/VirtioVsock
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
This allows anything that can be represented as a UnixStream to be used
as transport for an API server (e.g. virtio sockets).
A tower service expects an IP address as it's peer, which we can't
reliably provide for unix socket based transports, so just fake one.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
Dietmar Maurer
Dominik Csapak
Thomas Lamprecht
Wolfgang Bumiller
Stefan Reiter