While the user chosen description is not allowed to be
empty, we do leave it empty for recovery keys, as a "dummy
description" makes little sense...
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
Currently there's not yet a node config and the WA config is
somewhat "tightly coupled" to the user entries in that
changing it can lock them all out, so for now I opted for
fewer reorganization and just use a digest of the
canonicalized config here, and keep it all in the tfa.json
file.
Experimentally using the flatten feature on the methods with
an`Updater` struct similar to what the api macro is supposed
to be able to derive on its own in the future.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
document all public things, add some doc links and make some
previously-public things only available for test cases or within the
crate:
previously public, now private:
- AclTreeNode::extract_user_roles (we have extract_roles())
- AclTreeNode::extract_group_roles (same)
- AclTreeNode::delete_group_role (exists on AclTree)
- AclTreeNode::delete_user_role (same)
- AclTreeNode::insert_group_role (same)
- AclTreeNode::insert_user_role (same)
- AclTree::write_config (we have save_config())
- AclTree::load (we have config()/cached_config())
previously public, now crate-internal:
- AclTree::from_raw (only used by tests)
- split_acl_path (used by some test binaries)
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
by requiring
- Datastore.Backup permission for target datastore
- Remote.Read permission for source remote/datastore
- Datastore.Prune if vanished snapshots should be removed
- Datastore.Modify if another user should own the freshly synced
snapshots
reading a sync job entry only requires knowing about both the source
remote and the target datastore.
note that this does not affect the Authid used to authenticate with the
remote, which of course also needs permissions to access the source
datastore.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
instead of hard-coding 'backup@pam'. this allows a bit more flexibility
(e.g., syncing to a datastore that can directly be used as restore
source) without overly complicating things.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
it's not used anywhere, and not needed either until the day we might
implement push syncs.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
for verifying a whole datastore. Datastore.Backup now allows verifying
only backups owned by the triggering user.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
in most generic places. this is accompanied by a change in
RpcEnvironment to purposefully break existing call sites.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
To cater to the paranoid, a new datastore-wide setting "verify-new" is
introduced. When set, a verify job will be spawned right after a new
backup is added to the store (only verifying the added snapshot).
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
Previously only Datastore.Modify was required for creating a new
datastore.
But, that endpoint allows one to pass an arbitrary path, of which all
parent directories will be created, this can allow any user with the
"Datastore Admin" role on "/datastores" to do some damage to the
system. Further, it is effectively a side channel for revealing the
systems directory structure through educated guessing and error
handling.
Add a new privilege "Datastore.Allocate" which, for now, is used
specifically for the create datastore API endpoint.
Add it only to the "Admin" role.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
avoiding the need for reshuffling all bits when a new privilege is
added at the start or in the middle of this definition.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>